After Ricoh's official announcement of the M-mount expansion unit, I decided to buy one, although I had not intended to do so originally. Here are my first personal experiences with the lenses that I bought (or tried to buy). This page is devoted to the Zeiss Biogon f2.8/35mm lens.
Note: In order to avoid copyright issues, I replaced the Zeiss and Voigtländer lens photos with my own ones.
After I had acquired the M-mount expansion unit in mid-October 2011, I decided to also expand my range of lenses into focal lengths that I already own in the form of A12 camera units. This was caused by the observation that I was too lazy to exchange units. Exchanging lenses only seemed much simpler and also simplifies the equipment that I carry around with me. This decision turned out to become a very expensive one, because both of the Voigtländer lenses that I bought were decentered. So I sent them back (the 35mm lens even twice) and finally bought the equivalent Zeiss Biogon lenses at a much higher cost.
|Photo: Arrived on November 8/17, 2011: Voigtländer Color Skopar Pancake II f2.5/35mm (52.5mm equiv.) -> returned (Nov 14 and Nov 21)||Photo: Arrived on November 16, 2011: Voigtländer Color Skopar Pancake II f4/21mm (31.5mm equiv.) -> returned (Nov 21)|
Here is the story of the two Voigtländer lenses, a 35mm and a 21mm pancake lens, that I bought initially: The first sample of the Voigtländer Color Skopar Pancake II f2.5/35mm was fuzzy at the right edge. I exchanged it for another one that was fuzzy at the left edge, particularly at the lower left corner. Therefore, I decided to return it as well and bought a Zeiss Biogon f2.8/35mm, which is covered here. The first sample Voigtländer Color Skopar Pancake II f4/21mm was fuzzy at the left edge, for a change. I returned it as well and bought a Zeiss f4.5/21mm Biogon from the same dealer, which was, in the end, a little bit more expensive than even my Zeiss Sonnar f1.5/50mm.
Photos: Voigtländer Color Skopar Pancake II 1:2.5/35mm (left) and Voigtländer Color Skopar Pancake II 1:4/21mm (right) - click photos for larger versions
All in all, I am less than satisfied with the two Voigtländer Color Skopar Pancake II lenses that I bought. While these lenses got some favorable reviews, you probably need to be very lucky when you take part in the Voigtländer lens lottery. A dealer who should know better (they have 80% of the Voigtländer market) told me that only 0.4% of the Voigtländer are returned, which ia s low as the return rate for Zeiss and Leitz lenses - regrettably mine was 75%! Obviously, I was not lucky. Therefore, with a heavy heart I decided to go for the much more expensive and bulky Zeiss Biogon lenses.
So here is my Zeiss Biogon T* C 1:2.8/35mm that finally replaced the Voigtländer 35mm pancake lens:
Photos: Arrived on November 22, 2011 as a replacement: Zeiss Biogon T* C 1:2.8/35mm ZM (black) (52.5mm equiv.)
The Zeiss lens is a little bit slower, heavier, and much more expensive than the respective Voigtländer pancake lens.
Photo: Body with A12 M-mount expansion unit attached and Zeiss Biogon f2.8/35mm lens
|Focal length||35mm (52.5mm equiv.)|
|Angle of view (35mm film)||62° diagonal|
|Number of iris blades||10|
|Number of lenses/groups||7/5|
|Length (with cap)||55mm|
|Lens hood||do not have one|
Here are some samples taken with the Zeiss Biogon f2.8/35mm lens:
Disclaimer: I am not a lens expert who sees marked differences between various Leica and/or other lenses. I can check for soft corners, find differences in color rendition, and, in rare cases, may discover a "3D look", but that's all. Please regard therefore my conclusions as the verdict of a "layman".
It is far too early for me to draw any conclusions. As far as I can see, the results that my new 35mm lens produces with the M-mount unit are very pleasing.